Thanks to Sally, who heads our ILD Support Group, for sending this article to our group. It is a Concise Clinical Review of my disease, Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis. I learned a lot reading it. It is long and very medical but well worth the time. I could not get the Figures and Diagrams to be included so please excuse those references.
Concise Clinical Review
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis
Insights in Diagnosis and Pathobiology Moise ́s Selman1, Annie Pardo2, and Talmadge E. King, Jr.3
1Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias “Ismael Cos ́ıo Villegas,” Mexico DF, Mexico; 2Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico DF, Mexico; and 3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex syndrome resulting from repeated exposure to a variety of organic particles. HP may present as acute, subacute, or chronic clinical forms but with frequent overlap of these various forms. An intriguing question is why only few of the exposed individuals develop the disease. According to a two-hit model, antigen exposure associated with genetic or environmental promoting factors provokes an immuno- pathological response. This response is mediated by immune com- plexes in the acute form and by Th1 and likely Th17 T cells in subacute/chronic cases. Pathologically, HP is characterized by a bronchiolocentric granulomatous lymphocytic alveolitis, which evolves to fibrosis in chronic advanced cases. On high-resolution computed tomography scan, ground-glass and poorly defined nodules, with patchy areas of air trapping, are seen in acute/ subacute cases, whereas reticular opacities, volume loss, and trac- tion bronchiectasis superimposed on subacute changes are ob- served in chronic cases. Importantly, subacute and chronic HP may mimic several interstitial lung diseases, including nonspecific inter- stitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia, making diagno- sis extremely difficult. Thus, the diagnosis of HP requires a high index of suspicion and should be considered in any patient present- ing with clinical evidence of interstitial lung disease. The definitive diagnosis requires exposure to known antigen, and the assemblage of clinical, radiologic, laboratory, and pathologic findings. Early diagnosis and avoidance of further exposure are keys in manage- ment of the disease. Corticosteroids are generally used, although their long-term efficacy has not been proved in prospective clinical trials. Lung transplantation should be recommended in cases of progressive end-stage illness.
Keywords: hypersensitivity pneumonitis; extrinsic allergic; immune response; diagnosis
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex syndrome caused by exposure to a wide variety of organic particles small enough to reach the alveoli (,5 mm). In susceptible individuals, these antigens provoke an exaggerated immune response of the small airways and lung parenchyma (1). The causative antigens include fungi; bacterial, protozoal, animal, and insect proteins; and low–molecular-weight chemical compounds (Table 1). HP may occur in a variety of occupational, home, and recreational environments (1).
EPIDEMIOLOGY
The prevalence varies considerably around the world, depend- ing on disease definition, diagnostic methods, type and intensity of exposure, geographical conditions, agricultural and indus- trial practices, and host risk factors. Furthermore, the definite prevalence of HP is uncertain, primarily because cases may go undetected or are misdiagnosed. In addition, there is no consis- tent, standardized epidemiological approach for assessing the various forms of HP. High attack rates may be found among exposed individuals during sporadic outbreaks and in occupa- tional settings. Studies on incidence are scanty. In a large, general-population–based study, the incidence of HP was ap- proximately 1 per 100,000 in the UK population (2). The dis- ease is uncommon in children, and a recent report in Denmark showed an incidence of 2 per year and a prevalence of 4 per 1,000,000 children (3).
PATHOGENESIS
An intriguing question regarding HP is why, given the universal and wide distribution of the offending antigens, only few individ- uals develop the disease. A two-hit hypothesis has been suggested, wherein preexisting genetic susceptibility or environmental factors (i.e., the first hit) increases the risk for the development of HP after antigen exposure (the second hit). Antigen exposure acts as the inducing factor, and genetic or environmental factors act as promoting risk factors (Figure 1).
ANTIGENS
HP is seen worldwide, and the most commonly implicated antigens are thermophilic actinomycete species, fungi, and bird proteins. Thermophilic actinomycete (i.e., Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula) and a variety of fungi (i.e., Aspergillus species and Penicillium species) are implicated in HP in a variety of occupations, such as farming, but also may be responsible for the disease acquired in home environments (e.g., summer-type HP in Japan) (4). A com- plex mixture of high– and low–molecular-weight proteins from avian serum, feces, and feathers produce the “bird fancier’s lung” (BFL), also called pigeon-breeder’s lung. Pigeons, parakeets, budgerigars, and other small cage birds are usually involved, but the disease may also occur in individuals using feather- down duvets and pillows and even by indirect contact to birds in consorts (e.g., handling others’ clothing).
Increasing evidence shows that colonization of heated water by Mycobacterium avium complex causes HP (for instance, in hot tub and warm water therapy pool users) (5). Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have a competitive advantage over many other bacterial species in these environments because of their thermotolerance and disinfectant resistance. Some NTM, like Mycobacterium immunogenum, have the ability to colonize con- taminated metalworking fluids and have been associated with HP
Concise Clinical Review
315
TABLE 1. ETIOLOGIC AGENTS OF HYPERSENSITIVITY PNEUMONITIS
Disease
Fungal and bacterial Farmer’s lung Ventilation pneumonitis; humidifier lung;
air conditioner lung Bagassosis
Mushroom worker’s lung Enoki mushroom worker’s lung (Japan) Suberosis
Detergent lung; washing powder lung Malt worker’s lung Sequoiosis
Maple bark stripper’s lung Cheese washer’s lung Woodworker’s lung
Hardwood worker’s lung Paprika slicer’s lung Sauna taker’s lung Familial HP
Wood trimmer’s lung Composter’s lung Basement shower HP Hot tub lung
Wine maker’s lung Woodsman’s disease Thatched roof lung Tobacco grower’s lung Potato riddler’s lung
Summer-type pneumonitis Dry rot lung Stipatosis Machine operator’s lung Residential provoked pneumonitis Amebae Humidifier lung
Shower curtain disease Animal proteins
Pigeon breeder’s or pigeon fancier’s disease Pituitary snuff taker’s lung Fish meal worker’s lung Bat lung
Furrier’s lung
Animal handler’s lung; laboratory worker’s lung Insect proteins
Miller’s lung Lycoperdonosis
Antigen
Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula Thermoactinomyces vulgaris, Thermoactinomyces sacchari,
Thermoactinomyces candidus, Klebsiella oxytoca T. vulgaris T. sacchari Penicillium citrinum
Thermoactinomyces viridis, Aspergillus fumigatus, Penicillium frequentans, Penicillium glabrum
Bacillus subtilis enzymes Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus clavatus Graphium, Pullularia, and Trichoderma spp.,
Aureobasidium pullulans Cryptostroma corticale Penicillium casei, A. clavatus Alternaria spp., wood dust
Paecilomyces Mucor stolonifer Aureobasidium spp., other sources B. subtilis Rhizopus spp., Mucor spp. T. vulgaris, Aspergillus Epicoccum nigrum Mycobacterium avium complex Botrytis cinerea Penicillium spp. Saccharomonospora viridis Aspergillus spp. Thermophilic actinomycetes, S. rectivirgula, T. vulgaris,
Aspergillus spp. Trichosporon cutaneum Merulius lacrymans Aspergillus fumigatus; T. actinomycetes Mycobacterium immunogenum; Pseudomonas fluorescens Aureobasidium pullulans Naegleria gruberi, Acanthamoeba polyphaga,
Acanthamoeba castellani, Bacillus sp., others Phoma violacea
Avian droppings, feathers, serum Pituitary snuff Fish meal Bat serum protein
Animal fur dust Rats, gerbils
Sitophilus granarius (i.e., wheat weevil) Puffball spores
Source
Definition of abbreviation: HP 1⁄4 hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Reprinted by permission from Reference 1.
in automotive plants and metalworking operations, such as metal cutting, machine finishing, and machine tooling (6).
Some low–molecular-weight chemicals, such as isocyanates, may sometimes cause HP. Isocyanates are not antigenic by them- selves but may combine with host proteins forming haptens. Iso- cyanates are used for the large-scale production of polyurethane polymers, widely used in the manufacture of polyurethane foams, paints, and plastics.
PROMOTING AND PROTECTING FACTORS
Genetic Susceptibility
Studies regarding genetic susceptibility are few. Given its role in regulating the immune response, a focus has been placed on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The high level of poly- morphism and heterozygosity within the MHC genomic region
provide the immune system with a selective advantage against the diversity of pathogens but has the added risk of generating diverse immunopathological disorders. Class II MHC molecules appear to be the primary susceptibility locus in HP, and, accord- ingly, polymorphisms associated with HLA-DR and DQ have been associated with increased risk for HP in populations with different genetic backgrounds (7, 8).
Likewise, the immunoproteasome catalytic subunit, b type 8 (PSMB8), which participates in the degradation of ubiquiti- nated proteins generating peptides presented by MHC class I molecules, is also implicated. Patients with HP had a significant increase of the PSMB8 KQ genotype frequency compared with matched control subjects (9). Likewise, polymorphisms of the transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP) genes have been shown to increase the susceptibility for HP (10). TAP transports peptides for loading onto class I MHC molecules
Moldy hay, grain, silage Contaminated forced-air systems; water reservoirs
Moldy sugarcane (i.e., bagasse) Moldy mushroom compost Moldy mushroom compost Moldy cork
Detergents (during processing or use) Moldy barley Moldy wood dust
Moldy maple bark Moldy cheese Oak, cedar, and mahogany dust, pine and
spruce pulp Kiln-dried wood Moldy paprika pods Contaminated sauna water Contaminated wood dust in walls Contaminated wood trimmings Compost Mold on unventilated shower Hot tub mists; mold on ceiling Mold on grapes Oak and maple trees Dead grasses and leaves Tobacco plants Moldy hay around potatoes
Contaminated old houses Rotten wood Esparto dust Aerosolized metalworking fluid Residential exposure Contaminated water from home humidifier,
ultrasonic misting fountains Moldy shower curtain
Parakeets, budgerigars, pigeons, chickens, turkeys Bovine and porcine pituitary proteins Fish meal dust Bat droppings
Animal pelts Urine, serum, pelts, proteins
Dust-contaminated grain Lycoperdon puffballs
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 186 2012
that present them to cytotoxic T cells at the cell surface. HP susceptibility was associated with the allele Gly-637 and the genotypes Asp-637/Gly-637 and Pro-661/Pro-661 of the subunit TAP1 (10). TNF-a gene, also located within MHC, has been explored with contradictory results. Thus, although patients with farmer’s lung display high frequency of TNFA2 (-308) allele, which increases its biological activity, in patients with BFL this allele is similar to control subjects (8, 11). Two studies per- formed in patients with HP with different ethnic backgrounds demonstrated that promoter variants in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3) have a protective effect (12, 13). However, the mechanisms by which TIMP-3 polymorphism may decrease the risk to develop HP remain unclear.
In general, case-control studies evaluating gene polymor- phisms in HP have been performed in small cohorts, and at pres- ent, with the exception of the MHC, there are no genetic factors consistently associated with this disease.
Environmental Promoting Factors
Many individuals suffering from acute HP report initial symp- toms suggestive of respiratory viral infection, and many of them have common respiratory viruses in the lower respiratory tract (14). Interestingly, mice infected with parainfluenza virus de- velop an exacerbated inflammatory response to HP antigens that persists for up to 30 weeks after the viral infection (15).
A cross-sectional analysis of a large, heterogeneous farming population found that high pesticide exposure, both organochlo- rine and carbamate, was strongly associated with a diagnosis of farmer’s lung, indicating that pesticide exposure may be an overlooked risk factor for farmer’s lung (16).
The Paradoxical Role of Cigarette Smoking
HP is less frequent in smokers than in nonsmokers under the same risk of exposure (1). Moreover, when exposed to an environment with high levels of HP antigens, smokers have lower levels of specific antibodies to the causative antigen. The mechanisms by which cigarette smoke protects from HP are unclear, but exper- imental approaches attribute this effect to nicotine (17). Mice challenged with S. rectivirgula and simultaneously treated with nicotine showed a significant decrease of lung inflammation. Nicotine affects macrophage activation, decreases lymphocyte proliferation, and impairs T-cell function (17, 18). Activation of
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms in the pathogenesis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Most exposed individuals develop an immune tolerance, and the antigen inhalation may result at most in a mild increase of local lymphocytes, without clinical consequences. The coexistence of genetic or environmental promoting factors provokes the develop- ment of an exaggerated immune reaction that results in marked lung inflammation. The generation of the granu- lomatous inflammation requires, among others, the ex- pression of Th1 cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-a, IL-12, and interferon-g, as well as a toll-like re- ceptor 9–mediated dendritic cell response, which is be- lieved to promote Th1 skewing and prevent Th2 skewing during the development of the adaptive immune re- sponse. Subsequently, in the presence of progressing fac- tors (i.e., further exposure) or genetic predisposition, critical immunopathological changes occur in the lung microenvironment inducing the expansion and activation of the fibroblast population and the accumulation of extracellular matrix.
the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor a7 reduces the secretion of several proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages, whereas on lymphocytes it decreases the reactivity of the Th1 and Th17 lineages, increasing the Th2 response (18). Importantly, evidence indicates that although HP develops more frequently in non- smokers, when HP occurs in smokers, they may develop a chronic clinical course with more recurrent episodes and a significantly poorer survival rate compared with nonsmoker patients (19). In a murine model of BFL it was found that in short-term exposure (4 wk), cigarette smoke decreased inflammation and lymphocyte proliferation, whereas long-term exposure to cigarette smoke (17 wk) enhances lung inflammation with fibrosis (20).
Immune Tolerance as Protective Factor
Many exposed individuals develop a mild lymphocytic alveolitis but remain asymptomatic, suggesting the development of a toler- ant response to HP antigens (1). Although the mechanisms are unclear, tolerance may be mediated by regulatory T cells (Treg), a unique population of CD41 T cells that play a pivotal role in the maintenance of the balance between the tissue-damaging and protective effects of the immune response. Treg cells function as suppressors of Th1 and Th2 cell immune responses, and, for example, mice lacking them display overwhelming autoimmune disease (21).
It has been shown that although Treg from asymptomatic exposed subjects suppress T-cell proliferation similar to nor- mal unexposed individuals, these cells obtained from patients with HP (from blood and bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]) were unable to suppress activated T-cell proliferation (22). Also, in experimental HP it was demonstrated that Treg cells play a protective antiinflammatory role (23).
IMMUNOPATHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS OF DISEASE
Immune complexes mediate the acute form of HP. Subacute and chronic forms of HP are provoked by T lymphocytes through a Th1 immune response under the specific “master regulator” transcription factor, T-bet (1, 24). On interaction with the HP antigen presented by alveolar macrophages and dendritic cells (DC), CD41 T cells can differentiate into a variety of effector subsets. IL-12 and IFN-g polarize lymphocytes toward the Th1 cell differentiation program. Data in experimental models of HP suggest that the expression of CD34 and the toll-like
Concise Clinical Review
317
receptor-9 are critical for efficient trafficking of DC through the lungs and for development of a Th1 granulomatous inflamma- tory response (25, 26). Likewise, apoptosis of lung epithelial and immune cells promotes immune responses against HP antigens by enhancing maturation and chemokine production of CD11c1 DCs (27).
CD41 T cells can differentiate, in addition to the classical Th1 and Th2 cells, into a variety of other effector subsets, such as Th17 cells, follicular helper T cells, and induced Treg cells. Inter- estingly, microarray analysis in human HP revealed that in addi- tion to Th1 factors, IL-17 and IL-17–associated transcripts were also up-regulated (28). Furthermore, it was shown that in chronic exposure to S. rectivirgula, CD41 T cells were not polarized to Th1 but rather to Th17 with differential expression of IL-17A and IL-22 (29). Moreover, this study established an important role for CD41 Th17 cells in the subsequent development of lung fibrosis. Likewise, genetic deletion or antibody-mediated depletion of IL-17 resulted in decreased inflammation and protection against the disease (30). Thus, a Th-17 polarization with up-regulation of its signature cytokines appears to play an important role in the pathogenesis of HP.
The immunopathological processes contributing to disease chronicity and eventually to the development of fibrosis is begin- ning to be elucidated. Patients with chronic HP show an increase of CD41 T cells and of the CD41/CD81 ratio and exhibit skewing toward Th2 activity (31). Th2-biased immune response was also profibrotic in a murine model of chronic HP (32). By contrast, increase of gd T cells seems to have an antifibrotic and protective effect, partially involving the inhibition of ab T cells by the reg- ulatory IL-22 (31, 33). Thus, attenuation of IL-22 activity, either by mutating the receptor or inhibiting its signaling, accelerated lung fibrosis.
Interestingly, patients with HP exhibit increased frequency of fetal microchimerism (i.e., the persistence of foreign cells) that show a multilineage capacity, because the microchimeric cells in HP lungs were either macrophages, CD41, or CD81 T cells (34).
The presence of microchimerism appeared to increase the severity of the disease.
Finally, the role of other inflammatory cells in the fibrotic pro- cess is unclear. Some evidence suggests that patients with chronic fibrotic HP have an increase of neutrophils loaded with matrix metalloproteinase-8 and -9 (35).
CLINICAL BEHAVIOR
Although numerous antigens induce HP, the clinical features are similar and have been conventionally classified into acute, subacute, and chronic forms. Unfortunately, this classification scheme is inadequate because there are no widely accepted cri- teria to distinguish the various forms, little information exists concerning the latency between exposure and symptom onset, and it is uncertain that they represent different stages of the disease.
Reexamination of data from a large prospective multicenter cohort using cluster analysis showed that most of the cases ex- amined fit best into a two-cluster model. This study showed that subacute HP is particularly difficult to define because the fea- tures in this subset overlap with both the “acute” and “chronic” components. Patients in cluster 1 had more recurrent systemic symptoms (chills, body aches) and normal chest X-rays, whereas those in cluster 2 showed significantly more features of chronic and severe disease (i.e., clubbing, hypoxemia, restrictive pat- terns on pulmonary function tests, and fibrosis on high- resolution computed tomography [HRCT] scan) (36). Cluster 1 looks most like the classical acute form of HP and tends to occur in individuals exposed to thermophilic actinomycete spe- cies or fungi (e.g., farmer’s lung). Conversely, cluster 2 favors the classical chronic form of HP and tends to occur in individ- uals with bird antigen exposure (Table 2). Importantly, it is emphasized that the words acute and chronic do not describe pathogenic pathways and do not imply that chronic HP follows acute HP, which remains uncertain (36).
TABLE 2. DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL, PHYSIOLOGIC, RADIOLOGIC, BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE, HISTOLOGIC, AND PROGNOSTIC FEATURES BETWEEN MICROORGANISMS AND SOLUBLE AVIAN PROTEINS EXPOSURES
Antigen
Exposure Clinical behavior
Lung function tests Lung imaging studies
BAL Lung biopsy
Outcome
Microorganisms: Thermophilic Actinomycetes, Fungi (e.g., Farmer’s Lung; Water Damage)
Usually short and massive: z 750,000 actinomycetes spores per min
Primarily acute/subacute: higher frequency of fever and recurrent episodes
More recurrent systemic symptoms (chills, body aches) Mild restrictive abnormalities that resolve Airflow obstruction (usually mild) seen in chronic disease Chest X-ray: frequently normal
HRCT: ground glass opacities, predominating in the lower lobes, fine nodular shadowing
Most frequent long-term sequelae: mild emphysema often sparing the upper parts of the lung
Neutrophilia Lymphocytosis (. 50%) with decreased CD4/CD8 ratio (, 1) Small, poorly-formed noncaseating granulomas located near bronchioles Peripheral airways: proliferative bronchiolitis obliterans,
characterized by fibroblast proliferation, and an organizing
intraluminal exudate that occludes bronchioles from within Usually resolves Chronic exposure may lead to chronic bronchitis or emphysema
Soluble Avian Proteins (e.g., BFL)
Recurrent: breed dozens of pigeons in a loft. Insidious: prolonged and low level (i.e., few birds
in the domestic environment or down products) Recurrent BFL: cough and mild exertional dyspnea,
low-grade fever Insidious BFL: progressive dyspnea; clubbing Restrictive pattern Hypoxemia at rest or exercise common Chest X-ray: frequently abnormal HRCT: irregular reticular opacities, traction bronchiectasis
and honeycombing superimposed to subacute changes (e.g., ground-glass opacities or nodules)
Eosinophilia or neutrophilia Lymphocytosis (, 50%) with increased (. 1.0) CD4/CD8 ratio Ill-formed granulomas (may be difficult to identify) Fibrotic pattern: NSIP-pattern or UIP-like pattern. Peripheral airways: constrictive bronchiolitis
Poor, often progress to fibrosis
Definition of abbreviations: BAL 1⁄4 bronchoalveolar lavage; BFL 1⁄4 bird fancier’s lung; HP 1⁄4 hypersensitivity pneumonia; HRCT 1⁄4 high-resolution computed tomog- raphy; NSIP 1⁄4 nonspecific interstitial pneumonia; UIP 1⁄4 usual interstitial pneumonia.
Data from References 4, 36, 38, 42, 77.
318 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 186 2012
ACUTE HP
Acute HP is characterized by an influenza-like syndrome occur- ring a few hours after a (usually) substantial exposure. Symptoms gradually decrease over hours/days but often recur with reexpo- sure. Acute episodes can be indistinguishable from an acute re- spiratory infection caused by viral or mycoplasmal agents. In farmers, the differential diagnosis must include the organic dust toxic syndrome, which is usually associated with unloading silos. Occasionally, respiratory symptoms in acute HP are mild or ab- sent, and the disease can behave as a nonspecific febrile disorder. Furthermore, acute and subacute HP can be associated with wheezing, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and a normal chest radiograph. In these cases, the differential diagnosis includes asthma, mainly in occupational settings. In general, the acute form is nonprogressive and intermittent, with spontaneous im- provement after antigen avoidance. Importantly, some patients with recurrent acute episodes of farmer’s lung may develop an obstructive lung disease with centrilobular emphysema instead of fibrosis (37).
SUBACUTE HP
Subacute HP may result from repeated low-level exposure to in- haled antigens. It is characterized by an insidious onset of dysp- nea, fatigue, and cough that develops over weeks to a few months. Patients may have fever mainly at the onset of the ill- ness. The subacute form may represent patients with acute epi- sodes in which respiratory symptoms are mild or absent and thus behaving initially as a nonspecific febrile disorder until respira- tory symptoms become visible. In general, subacute HP is a progressive disease, with coughing and dyspnea becoming per- sistent. The differential diagnosis includes infectious pneumonia or noninfectious interstitial lung disease (ILD), such as sarcoid- osis. Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder with protean clinical manifestations, which affects several tissues. Lymph nodes are usually involved, and in contrast to HP, lung granulomas are well formed and distributed in a lymphangitic pattern, which is a dis- tinctive feature of this disease. Other disorders that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of HP include organizing pneumonia, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), lympho- cytic interstitial pneumonia, and drug-induced lung disease.
CHRONIC HP
Unrecognized and untreated acute/subacute episodes may evolve to chronic HP. However, many patients with chronic HP have no recognizable acute episodes and present as a slowly progressive (insidious) chronic respiratory disease. This pre- sentation is common in patients with bird antigen exposure. The clinical presentation is characterized by progressive dysp- nea, cough, fatigue, malaise, and weight loss. Digital clubbing may be present and predicts clinical deterioration (1). Often, these patients develop progressive fibrosis, and in advanced forms the disease may mimic idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or fibrotic NSIP (38).
ACUTE EXACERBATIONS
Some patients with chronic HP may experience an accelerated respiratory deterioration with the presence of new bilateral ground-glass opacities on HRCT scan (39, 40). These patients usually require assisted ventilation and have a poor progno- sis. Although the precipitating factors are unknown, acute exacerbation seems to occur mainly in smoker men with fewer lymphocytes and increased neutrophils in BAL fluids, with advanced fibrosis and worse pulmonary function at the time of diagnosis (39). Histology reveals organizing diffuse alveolar damage superimposed on fibrotic lung disease.
HRCT
Acute HP
HRCT is useful in separating the clinical forms of HP. HRCT may be normal in patients with symptomatic acute HP (41). When abnormal, the predominant findings are ground-glass opacities or poorly defined small nodules (42, 43). Diffuse areas of dense air-space consolidation may be associated with ground- glass opacities (43).
Subacute/Chronic HP
Because of the considerable overlap in clinical cases of sub- acute and chronic HP, the HRCT patterns are more variable. Ground-glass opacities or poorly defined small nodules are commonly found in subacute HP (Figure 2A). In addition, mosaic perfusion is observed in patients with extensive bron- chiolar obstruction and is secondary to shunting of blood away from poorly ventilated regions of lung. Patchy areas of air trapping on expiratory scans, often in a lobular distribu- tion, and representing indirect signs of small airways obstruc- tion, are seen in subacute and chronic HP (Figures 2B and 2C) (43, 44).
Distinctive HRCT findings in chronic HP are the combination of reticular, ground-glass, and centrilobular nodular opacities associated with signs of “fibrosis” (i.e., interlobular septal thick- ening, lobar volume loss, traction bronchiectasis, and honeycomb- ing) (Figure 3) (42, 45). The reticulation can have a predominantly subpleural or peribronchovascular distribution but often tends to spare the lung bases. The HRCT findings in chronic HP may mimic those of IPF. The features that best differentiate chronic HP from IPF and NSIP are the presence of lobular areas with decreased attenuation and air trapping, centrilobular nodules, and the lack of lower zone predominance (45). Patients with IPF are more likely to have basal predominance with honeycombing com- pared with those with chronic HP.
A small percentage of patients with subacute and chronic HP show thin-walled cysts, usually in areas of ground-glass attenu- ation, resembling those observed in lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (45, 46). Furthermore, some patients with chronic farmer’s lung, including lifelong nonsmokers, are more likely to develop emphysema than fibrosis (37). Interestingly, combined
Figure 2. (A) A 40-year-old woman exposed to birds. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan ob- tained through lower lungs shows numerous ill-defined nodules. (B) A 53-year-old woman exposed to birds. HRCT images show patchy ground-glass opacities, ill-defined nodules, and patchy areas of mosaic perfusion. (C) Same patient as in B. Expiratory image demonstrating the prom- inence of the attenuation differences supporting the pres- ence of air trapping (arrows).
Concise Clinical Review
319
pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, a pathological process de- scribed widely in IPF, has also been reported in chronic HP that morphologically has a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like pattern (47).
PULMONARY FUNCTION TESTS
In acute HP, lung function may be normal (41). However, ab- normal lung function is common in most patients characterized by a restrictive functional pattern with decreased capacities and compliance and moderate to severe reduction of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO). Hypoxemia is common; however, patients with mild/moderate disease may be normoxe- mic at rest, but develop hypoxemia with exercise. Importantly, these abnormalities are neither specific nor diagnostic for HP because similar changes are found in most ILDs. Thus, the importance of pulmonary function tests is to determine the se- verity of the physiologic impairment at diagnosis and during follow-up (1). Serial follow-up lung function studies in chronic HP are scanty. In some patients with farmer’s lung, a common functional impairment can be an obstructive defect with de- creased flow rates resulting from emphysema.
BAL
BAL is a highly sensitive method to detect lung inflammation in a patient suspected of having HP. An increase in the total cell count with a remarkable elevation in the percentage of T lym- phocytes, often over 50%, characterizes HP (Figure 4A). This increase is unusual in other diseases generally considered in the differential diagnosis, such as IPF (48, 49). However, in patients with HP who are smokers or have chronic, fibrotic parenchymal abnormalities, the BAL lymphocyte count is lower. An increase in BAL lymphocytes may be found in asymptomatic exposed individuals, which may represent a “normal” inflammatory re- sponse or the presence of a low-intensity alveolitis without clin- ical consequences (50).
The evaluation of CD41 and CD81 T-cell subsets is not recommended for clinical practice, because a growing body of evidence has shown that these subsets and the CD41/CD81 ratio diverge according to a number of situations, including the type of inhaled antigen, the intensity of exposure, the smok- ing habit, and the clinical stage (1, 31, 49).
Figure 3. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. High- resolution computed tomography scans obtained in four different patients (A) Bronchiolocentric septal thickening, patchy areas of ground-glass opacities, and consolidation with traction bronchiectasis and architec- tural distortion. (B) Irregular reticular opacities with trac- tion bronchiectasis and architectural distortion with a central distribution. Areas of ground-glass opacities are also present. (C) Subpleural predominant distribution of scattered nodules, ground-glass and reticular opacities, and traction bronchiectasis. (D) Irregular reticular and ground-glass opacities with architectural distortion, trac- tion bronchiectasis, and honeycombing (arrow) in a pe- ripheral distribution simulating the UIP-like pattern. Scattered ill-defined nodules are also present.
Small numbers of B-lymphocytes, plasma cells, and mast cells, and high levels of immunoglobulins M, G, and A and immunoglobulin-free light chains are also found in BAL fluids, mainly when BAL is performed a few days after the last antigen exposure (51, 52). It has been suggested that an increase in mast cells may distinguish HP and cryptogenic organizing pneu- monia from a number of other ILDs, although validation studies are insufficient (53). An increase in BAL neutrophils may also be observed in patients with acute HP.
The proteomic differences in BAL fluids of patients with HP showing UIP-like or NSIP-like patterns have been evaluated (54). Surfactant protein A, Ig heavy chain a, heat shock glycoprotein, haptoglobin b, and Ig J chain were significantly higher in the patients with UIP pattern, whereas glutathione s-transferase, vitamin D–binding protein, and b-actin were significantly higher in the patients with NSIP pattern. Diagnostic and pathological consequences of these findings are presently unknown.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Patients with acute HP rarely undergo biopsy. A retrospective study of selected cases of acute HP showed interstitial inflam- mation in a peribronchiolar pattern, loose histiocytic aggre- gates, prominent increase of interstitial neutrophils, and fibrin deposition (55). In some cases intraalveolar fibrin accumulation was marked, consistent with acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia.
Subacute HP, independent of the etiologic agent, is character- ized by a granulomatous interstitial bronchiolocentric pneumoni- tis. The inflammation is composed mainly of lymphocytes, with fewer plasma cells and histiocytes, and only occasional eosinophils and neutrophils (Figure 4B) (56). Typically, the granulomas are small, nonnecrotizing, poorly formed, and loosely arranged (Figure 4C). Associated lymphoid hyperplasia in the form of peribronchiolar lymphoid aggregates is present in most patients (56). With the exception of patients with hot tub lung, well- formed granulomas are uncommon. Isolated multinucleated giant cells containing various nonspecific cytoplasmic inclusions are usually seen. Importantly, granulomatous features may be absent in as many as 30% of surgical lung biopsies from patients with HP (56). In this context, detection of microgranulomas may improve by staining with cathepsin K, a cysteine prote- ase expressed at high levels in activated macrophages and
320
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 186 2012
epithelioid cells. Intense expression of cathepsin K was found in epithelioid and giant cells in all cases containing granulomas, including HP, whereas diseases characterized by large collections of alveolar macrophages, such as desquamative interstitial pneu- monia and respiratory bronchiolitis-ILD, were negative (57). This finding suggests that cathepsin K may represent a sensitive and specific marker to detect granulomas, mainly in chronic HP.
Chronic HP presents with fibrotic changes and architectural distortion superimposed on subacute changes (Figures 4D–4F). The pathological patterns may mimic UIP-like pattern, NSIP, organizing pneumonia, or airways-centered interstitial fibrosis (58, 59). The UIP-like pattern includes patchy fibrosis, sub- pleural honeycombing, and fibroblast foci. Occasionally these lung specimens may lack typical subacute changes and can be indistinguishable on pathologic grounds from idiopathic UIP (58–60). Histopathological evidence supporting HP includes bron- chiolocentric accentuation of the inflammation, peribronchial fi- brosis, bronchiolar epithelial hyperplasia, and the presence of granulomas or multinucleated giant cells (often containing cho- lesterol clefts) (56, 58–60). Peribronchiolar metaplasia is fre- quent in HP and occurs in a minority of patients with UIP/ IPF (60). In an autopsy study, centrilobular fibrosis involving peribronchiolar alveolar ducts with extensions into the perilob- ular areas giving the appearance of bridging fibrosis distin- guished chronic HP from IPF (61).
Although histologic changes associated with HP are relatively uniform in distribution, infrequently, lung biopsy shows discor- dant findings that included typical HP findings in one specimen and UIP-like pattern or nonspecific fibrotic changes in others (60). This observation indicates that, as in IPF, biopsy should be taken from two different lobes.
Figure 4. (A) Bronchoalveolar lavage of a patient with sub- acute hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) showing a marked increase in lymphocytes. (B) Photomicrograph (hematox- ylin and eosin [H&E]) of surgical lung biopsy from same patient illustrated in Figure 2A, showing two key histo- pathologic features of HP: the lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis and a poorly formed granuloma around a small airway (arrow). (C) High magnification photomi- crograph of a typical interstitial HP granuloma. (D) Chronic HP: Photomicrograph (H&E) of surgical lung bi- opsy showing fibrosis, architectural remodeling in peri- bronchiolar pattern. (E) Chronic HP: Photomicrograph (H&E) of surgical lung biopsy showing architectural remodeling with chronic inflammation, giant cell with a cholesterol cleft and a distinct centrilobular fibrosis. (F) Chronic HP: Photomicrograph (H&E) of surgical lung bi- opsy showing fibrosis, architectural remodeling with septal and subpleural fibrosis as seen in usual interstitial pneumo- nia (UIP) but without the honeycombing and fibroblastic foci required for diagnosis of UIP.
Cigarette smokers with chronic fibrotic HP may also have em- physematous lesions (61), and, importantly, some of them may also develop lung cancer, primarily squamous cell carcinoma (62). In general, lung cancers were observed in patients with a UIP-like pattern, and the tumors were located mainly adja- cent to honeycomb changes.
A recent study reported a curious finding of the coexistence of histopathological features of HP and pulmonary alveolar protei- nosis (63). The HRCT appearances were varied and the linkage between both (if any) is unclear.
ANTIGEN DETECTION, SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES, AND T-CELL CHALLENGE TESTING
Specific circulating antibodies are evidence of sensitization but not of disease and should be seen as a marker of exposure. How- ever, a positive test, in the appropriate clinical setting, supports the diagnosis of HP. False-negative results may be seen in acute and chronic HP cases. Several serological techniques, including electrosyneresis, enzyme immunoassay, and fluoroenzymeim- munoassay, have been successfully used to detect HP antigens (64, 65). Peptide nucleic acid–fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) and DNA-FISH assays were found useful for de- tection of M. immunogenum and of Pseudomonas in sputum (66). IgG antibody against avian antigens, quantified by fluor- ometry, provided a good discriminator of disease. Levels below 10 mg/L were insignificant, whereas increasing titers were as- sociated with disease (67). Increasing antibody titer reflected the likelihood of HP, and decreasing titers confirmed antigen avoidance.
Because it can be difficult to reveal specific antibodies in a number of patients with chronic fibrosis, it has been proposed
that the evaluation of the proliferation indices of peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated with the specific antigen can be used for diagnosis purposes (68). However, experience with this test is scanty.
INHALATION CHALLENGE
A natural challenge at the workplace or home, or a “provoked” inhalation challenge under standardized conditions after a pe- riod of avoidance, can recreate the symptoms and laboratory and functional abnormalities of a mild/moderate acute epi- sode. Typically, a positive challenge is characterized by cough and dyspnea, fever, and decrease of FVC and oxygen satura- tion a few hours (8–12 h) after exposure. Because the magni- tude of the attack is unpredictable, the patients should be monitored closely for at least 24 hours. If the inhalation chal- lenge is positive it can confirm, in the appropriate clinical setting, the diagnosis of HP, although false-negative results may occur (69, 70). However, because of a lack of standardized antigens (imprecise mixtures of antigen and nonspecific irri- tants) and challenge techniques and given the risk of a severe attack, the challenge should only be performed in selected patients by qualified personnel in specialized centers with experience with this procedure (1).
DIAGNOSTIC DILEMMA
HP represents a diagnostic challenge because of the absence of any unique features that distinguish it from other ILDs. The di- agnosis of HP relies on a high level of clinical suspicion, the rec- ognition of antecedent antigen exposure, and a constellation of clinical, radiologic, laboratory, and pathologic findings. Impor- tantly, several issues often delay or prevent the diagnosis of HP, including: failure to consider the diagnosis leading to inad- equate questioning of the patient and family about potential exposures (direct or indirect); dismissal of the relationship be- tween the exposure and the illness (in particular, presence of any history of water damage either in the home or work environ- ment should be examined); presence of negative serum precip- itins accepted as ruling out the possibility of HP; presence of normal lung function or chest imaging studies; absence of an offending antigen (seen in approximately 40% of the cases) lead- ing to consideration of another ILD, in particular IPF or NSIP; transbronchial lung biopsy read as “negative” or “inadequate”; or incomplete evaluation of the lung biopsy, usually because subtle findings are assumed to be insignificant and not features of HP.
In general, the diagnosis depends on the clinical presentation and type of exposure (Table 2). Massive exposure and the pres- ence of a flu-like syndrome with substantial improvement in a few hours/weeks can be quite helpful in the diagnosis acute HP. Patchy ground-glass opacities on HRCT scan and increased BAL neutrophils and lymphocytes are also important diagnostic clues.
The diagnosis of subacute/chronic HP is most troublesome. An algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of subacute/chronic HP is included in Figure 5. Evidence of exposure and specific serum antibodies, an ILD clinical behavior, BAL lymphocyto- sis, and ground-glass opacities, poorly defined centrilobular nodules, and mosaic attenuation and air trapping on HRCT scan are very useful findings supporting the diagnosis. Lung biopsy, if performed, shows a granulomatous interstitial bron- chiolocentric pneumonitis. Recurrent chronic HP has similar findings to subacute HP, but reticular opacities superimposed to subacute changes on HRCT scan and fibrotic changes on lung biopsy are usually seen. Insidious chronic HP may lack subacute features and may represent an unsolvable diagnostic problem.
Figure 5. Algorithmic approach for the diagnosis of subacute/chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). The algorithm takes into consider- ation two important initial findings for the suspicion of subacute or chronic HP, clinical and functional features of an interstitial lung disease (ILD), and the antecedent of exposure based in the history and the presence of specific antibodies. Both the exposure and circulating spe- cific antibodies are necessary primarily in regions/areas with high prev- alence of antigen exposure, for example in countries where keeping birds at home is a common hobby. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cel- lular analysis is not required in all cases; however, the presence of a “typical” high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan and BAL lymphocytosis (blue arrows) makes the diagnosis of HP confident. Typical HRCT features include ground-glass opacities, poorly defined small nodules, mosaic perfusion, and patchy areas of air trapping on expiratory scans (see Figure 2). Any other combination makes the spe- cific diagnosis more difficult and, in the absence of other diagnostic clues, lung biopsy is recommended (red arrows). Although transbron- chial biopsy is often performed with BAL, it is uncommon for the biop- sies to yield diagnostic features of HP; consequently, in the vast majority of cases, surgical lung biopsy is required.
TREATMENT
Early diagnosis and antigen avoidance are key actions in the management of HP. Although some patients may remit despite subsequent exposure, sustained antigen inhalation is associated with an adverse outcome in most cases.
Improvements in the industrial and agricultural work condi- tions are essential to reduce occupational exposure; sometimes moving the worker from exposure may be necessary. Also, it is important to minimize microbial or avian-antigen exposure by having a clean environment at home. Home and workplace inspections are useful to guarantee environmental control. The use of air-purifying respirators may be indicated for patients un- able or unwilling to separate from the antigen to minimize expo- sure. However, patients usually complain of mask discomfort and refuse to use it for long periods.
Pharmacological therapy consists primarily of systemic corti- costeroids, although their long-term efficacy has not been proved in prospective clinical trials. In patients with subacute disease, if antigen exposure is avoided, 3 to 6 months of prednisone can be enough for disease remission. However, in patients with sub- acute progressive and chronic disease, corticosteroids may need to be sustained for prolonged time. An empiric scheme may con- sist of 0.5 mg/kg/d of prednisone for 4 to 6 weeks followed by a gradual reduction until a maintenance dose of approximately 10 mg/d is reached (1). Complete withdrawal of corticosteroids
322 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 186 2012
is recommended in the absence of clinical and/or functional response. Corticosteroids are also useful in NTM-related HP (i.e., hot tub), especially in severely affected patients. Antimy- cobacterial therapy does not appear to be required. Progres- sive lung scarring that characterizes chronic advanced HP has no effective therapy, and lung transplantation should be recommended.
Treatment of pediatric HP has been extrapolated from adults. In a small cohort of children, monthly courses of high doses of intravenous methylprednisolone were used (3). In addition, oral prednisolone was used in most cases, and according to severity, other immunosuppressive drugs such as azathioprine or cyclo- sporine were added. Most children improved, and no mortality was observed (3). Experience in adults, however, is scanty. Inhaled corticosteroids have occasionally been used to reduce the severe side effects of prolonged systemic steroid therapy; however, evidence of efficacy is lacking (1).
PROGNOSIS
There are few population-based studies regarding HP mortality. Data obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics multiple cause-of-death data files for the period 1980 to 2002 for US residents aged 15 years or older revealed an increase in HP mortality from 0.09 to 0.29 per million, although it is un- clear what factors accounted for this increase (71). By contrast, the mortality rate was stable over a 40-year period (1968–2008) in England and Wales, although it increased over time in the older population (72).
In the clinical setting, most of our knowledge about outcome derives from research in pigeon breeder’s disease or farmer’s lung, but whether these observations are relevant to other causes is uncertain. In general, patients with acute disease, if correctly and timely diagnosed and treated, have a good prog- nosis, and patients usually improve. By contrast, patients with subacute/chronic HP (in particular those with bird fancier’s dis- ease) often progress to irreversible pulmonary fibrosis and may die within a few years after diagnosis (73). Actually, the finding of fibrosis at lung biopsy or HRCT scan indicates a poor prog- nosis (65, 66, 73–75). Moreover, patients with UIP-like and fibrotic NSIP patterns show a survival rate similar to that ob- served in IPF (73, 74). Pulmonary hypertension occurs in ap- proximately 20% of patients with chronic HP and is associated with a greater risk of death (76).
Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.
References
1. Selman M. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. In: Interstitial lung disease, 5th ed. Schwarz M, and King TE Jr, editors. Shelton, CT: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2011. pp. 597–625.
2. Solaymani-Dodaran M, West J, Smith C, Hubbard R. Extrinsic allergic alveolitis: incidence and mortality in the general population. QJM 2007;100:233–237.
3. Buchvald F, Petersen BL, Damgaard K, Deterding R, Langston C, Fan LL, Deutsch GH, Dishop MK, Kristensen LA, Nielsen KG. Frequency, treatment, and functional outcome in children with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2011;46:1098–1107.
4. Selman M, Lacasse Y, Pardo A, Cormier Y. Hypersensitivity pneumo- nitis caused by fungi. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2010;7:229–236.
5. Sood A, Sreedhar R, Kulkarni P, Nawoor AR. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis-like granulomatous lung disease with nontuberculous mycobacteria from exposure to hot water aerosols. Environ Health Perspect 2007;115:262–266.
6. Tillie-Leblond I, Grenouillet F, Reboux G, Roussel S, Chouraki B, Lorthois C, Dalphin JC, Wallaert B, Millon L. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and metalworking fluids contaminated by mycobacteria. Eur Respir J 2011;37:640–647.
7. Ando M, Hirayama K, Soda K, Okubo R, Araki S, Sasazuki T. HLA-DQw3 in Japanese summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis induced by Trichosporon cutaneum. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140: 948–950.
8. CamarenaA,JuarezA,MejiaM,EstradaA,CarrilloG,Falfa ́nR,Zun ̃iga J, Navarro C, Granados J, Selman M. Major histocompatibility complex and tumor necrosis factor-alpha polymorphisms in pigeon breeder’s disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:1528–1533.
9. Camarena A, Aquino-Galvez A, Falfa ́n-Valencia R, Sa ́nchez G, Montan ̃o M, Ramos C, Jua ́rez A, Garcı ́a-de-Alba C, Granados J, Selman M. PSMB8 (LMP7) but not PSMB9 (LMP2) gene polymorphisms are as- sociated to pigeon breeder’s hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Respir Med 2010;104:889–894.
10. Aquino-Galvez A, Camarena A, Montan ̃o M, Juarez A, Zamora AC, Gonza ́lez-Avila G, Checa M, Sandoval-Lo ́pez G, Vargas-Alarcon G, Granados J, et al. Transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) 1 gene polymorphisms in patients with hypersensitivity pneu- monitis. Exp Mol Pathol 2008;84:173–177.
11. Schaaf BM, Seitzer U, Pravica V, Aries SP, Zabel P. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha -308 promoter gene polymorphism and increased tumor necrosis factor serum bioactivity in farmer’s lung patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:379–382.
12. Hill MR, Briggs L, Montan ̃o M, Estrada A, Laurent GJ, Selman M, Pardo A. Promoter variants in tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3) protect against susceptibility in pigeon breeders’ disease. Thorax 2004;59:586–590.
13. Janssen R, Kruit A, Grutters JC, Ruven HJ, van Moorsel CM, van den Bosch JM. TIMP-3 promoter gene polymorphisms in BFL. Thorax 2005;60:974.
14. Dakhama A, Hegele RG, Laflamme G, Israe ̈l-Assayag E, Cormier Y. Common respiratory viruses in lower airways of patients with acute hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159: 1316–1322.
15. Cormier Y, Tremblay GM, Fournier M, Israe ̈l-Assayag E. Long-term viral enhancement of lung response to Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:490–494.
16. Hoppin JA, Umbach DM, Kullman GJ, Henneberger PK, London SJ, Alavanja MC, Sandler DP. Pesticides and other agricultural factors associated with self-reported farmer’s lung among farm residents in the Agricultural Health Study. Occup Environ Med 2007;64: 334–341.
17. Blanchet MR, Israe ̈l-Assayag E, Cormier Y. Inhibitory effect of nicotine on experimental hypersensitivity pneumonitis in vivo and in vitro. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:903–909.
18. Nizri E, Irony-Tur-Sinai M, Lory O, Orr-Urtreger A, Lavi E, Brenner T. Activation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory system by nicotine attenuates neuroinflammation via suppression of Th1 and Th17 responses. J Immunol 2009;183:6681–6688.
19. Ohtsuka Y, Munakata M, Tanimura K, Ukita H, Kusaka H, Masaki Y, Doi I, Ohe M, Amishima M, Homma Y, et al. Smoking promotes insidious and chronic farmer’s lung disease, and deteriorates the clinical outcome. Intern Med 1995;34:966–971.
20. Furuiye M, Miyake S, Miyazaki Y, Ohtani Y, Inase N, Umino T, Yoshizawa Y. Effect of cigarette smoking on the development of murine chronic pigeon breeder’s lung. The difference between a short-term and a long-term exposure. J Med Dent Sci 2007;54:87–95.
21. Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY. Regulatory T cells prevent catastrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol 2007;8:191–197.
22. Girard M, Israe ̈ l-Assayag E, Cormier Y. Impaired function of regulatory T-cells in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir J 2011;37:632–639. 23. Park Y, Oh SJ, Chung DH. CD4(1)CD25(1) regulatory T cells attenuate hypersensitivity pneumonitis by suppressing IFN-gamma production by
CD4(1) and CD8(1) T cells. J Leukoc Biol 2009;86:1427–1437. 24. Aune TM, Collins PL, Chang S. Epigenetics and T helper 1 differenti-
ation. Immunology 2009;126:299–305. 25. Bhan U, Newstead MJ, Zeng X, Ballinger MN, Standiford LR,
Standiford TJ. Stachybotrys chartarum-induced hypersensitivity
pneumonitis is TLR9 dependent. Am J Pathol 2011;179:2779–2787. 26. Blanchet MR, Bennett JL, Gold MJ, Levantini E, Tenen DG, Girard M, Cormier Y, McNagny KM. CD34 is required for dendritic cell trafficking
Concise Clinical Review
323
and pathology in murine hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 2011;184:687–698. 27. Hwang SJ, Kim HS, Chung DH. Fas/Fas ligand-mediated apoptosis
promotes hypersensitivity pneumonitis in mice by enhancing mat- uration of dendritic cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181: 1250–1261.
28. Selman M, Pardo A, Barrera L, Estrada A, Watson SR, Wilson K, Aziz N, Kaminski N, Zlotnik A. Gene expression profiles distinguish idi- opathic pulmonary fibrosis from hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:188–198.
29. Simonian PL, Roark CL, Wehrmann F, Lanham AK, Diaz del Valle F, Born WK, O’Brien RL, Fontenot AP. Th17-polarized immune re- sponse in a murine model of hypersensitivity pneumonitis and lung fibrosis. J Immunol 2009;182:657–665.
30. Joshi AD, Fong DJ, Oak SR, Trujillo G, Flaherty KR, Martinez FJ, Hogaboam CM. Interleukin-17-mediated immunopathogenesis in experimental hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;179:705–716.
31. Barrera L, Mendoza F, Zun ̃ iga J, Estrada A, Zamora AC, Melendro EI, Ramı ́rez R, Pardo A, Selman M. Functional diversity of T-cell sub- populations in subacute and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:44–55.
32. Mitaka K, Miyazaki Y, Yasui M, Furuie M, Miyake S, Inase N, Yoshizawa Y. Th2-biased immune responses are important in a mu- rine model of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;154:264–274.
33. Simonian PL, Wehrmann F, Roark CL, Born WK, O’Brien RL, Fontenot AP. gd T cells protect against lung fibrosis via IL-22. J Exp Med 2010;207:2239–2253.
34. Bustos ML, Frı ́as S, Ramos S, Estrada A, Arreola JL, Mendoza F, Gaxiola M, Salcedo M, Pardo A, Selman M. Local and circulating microchimerism is associated with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:90–95.
35. Pardo A, Barrios R, Gaxiola M, Segura-Valdez L, Carrillo G, Estrada A, Mej ́ıaM,SelmanM.Increaseoflungneutrophilsinhypersensitivity pneumonitis is associated with lung fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1698–1704.
36. Lacasse Y, Selman M, Costabel U, Dalphin JC, Morell F, Erkinjuntti- Pekkanen R, Mueller NL, Colby TV, Schuyler M, Jomphe V, et al. HP Study Group. Classification of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a hypothesis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2009;149:161–166.
37. Malinen AP, Erkinjuntti-Pekkanen RA, Partanen PL, Rytko ̈nen HT, Vanninen RL. Long-term sequelae of Farmer’s lung disease in HRCT: a 14-year follow-up study of 88 patients and 83 matched control farmers. Eur Radiol 2003;13:2212–2221.
38. Churg A, Muller NL, Flint J, Wright JL. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:201–208.
39. Miyazaki Y, Tateishi T, Akashi T, Ohtani Y, Inase N, Yoshizawa Y. Clinical predictors and histologic appearance of acute exacer- bations in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 2008;134: 1265–1270.
40. Olson AL, Huie TJ, Groshong SD, Cosgrove GP, Janssen WJ, Schwarz MI, Brown KK, Frankel SK. Acute exacerbations of fibrotic hyper- sensitivity pneumonitis. Chest 2008;134:844–850.
41. Lynch DA, Rose CS, Way D, King TE Jr. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: sensitivity of high-resolution CT in a population-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:469–472.
42. Tateishi T, Ohtani Y, Takemura T, Akashi T, Miyazaki Y, Inase N, Yoshizawa Y. Serial high-resolution computed tomography findings of acute and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis induced by avian antigen. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011;35:272–279.
43. Patel RA, Sellami D, Gotway MB, Golden JA, Webb WR. Hypersen- sitivity pneumonitis: patterns on high-resolution CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:965–970.
44. Hansell DM, Wells AU, Padley SP, Mu ̈ller NL. Hypersensitivity pneu- monitis: correlation of individual CT patterns with functional abnor- malities. Radiology 1996;199:123–128.
45. Silva CI, Mu ̈ller NL, Lynch DA, Curran-Everett D, Brown KK, Lee KS, Chung MP, Churg A. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: differentiation from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia by using thin-section CT. Radiology 2008; 246:288–297.
46. Franquet T, Hansell DM, Senbanjo T, Remy-Jardin M, Mu ̈ ller NL. Lung cysts in subacute hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:475–478.
47. Wright JL, Tazelaar HD, Churg A. Fibrosis with emphysema. Histopa- thology 2011;58:517–524.
48. Ohshimo S, Bonella F, Cui A, Beume M, Kohno N, Guzman J, Costabel U. Significance of bronchoalveolar lavage for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;179:1043–1047.
49.
Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, Brown KK, Costabel U, du Bois RM, Drent M, Haslam PL, Kim DS, Nagai S, et al.; on behalf of the American Thoracic Society Committee on BAL in Interstitial Lung Disease. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185:1004–1014.
50. Cormier Y, Le ́tourneau L, Racine G. Significance of precipitins and asymptomatic lymphocytic alveolitis: a 20-yr follow-up. Eur Respir J 2004;23:523–525.
51. Drent M, van Velzen-Blad H, Diamant M, Wagenaar SS, Hoogsteden HC, van den Bosch JM. Bronchoalveolar lavage in extrinsic allergic alveolitis: effect of time elapsed since antigen exposure. Eur Respir J 1993;6:1276–1281.
52. Groot Kormelink T, Pardo A, Knipping K, Buendı ́a-Rolda ́n I, Garcı ́a- de-Alba C, Blokhuis BR, Selman M, Redegeld FA. Immunoglobulin free light chains are increased in hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e25392.
53. Schildge J, Klar B, Hardung-Backes M. Mast cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with interstitial lung diseases. Pneumologie 2003;57:202–207.
54. Okamoto T, Miyazaki Y, Shirahama R, Tamaoka M, Inase N. Proteome analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Allergol Int 2011;61:83–92.
55. Hariri LP, Mino-Kenudson M, Shea B, Digumarthy S, Onozato M, Yagi Y, Fraire AE, Matsubara O, Mark EJ. Distinct histopathology of acute onset or abrupt exacerbation of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Hum Pathol 2011;43:660–668.
56. Myers JL. Hypersensitivity pneumonia: the role of lung biopsy in diag- nosis and management. Mod Pathol 2012;25:S58–S67.
57. Reghellin D, Poletti V, Tomassett S, Dubini A, Cavazza A, Rossi G, Lestani M, Pedron S, Daniele I, Montagna L, et al. Cathepsin-K is a sensitive immunohistochemical marker for detection of micro- granulomas in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2010;27:57–63.
58. Churg A, Sin DD, Everett D, Brown K, Cool C. Pathologic patterns and survival in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:1765–1770.
59. Gaxiola M, Buendı ́a-Rolda ́n I, Mejı ́a M, Carrillo G, Estrada A, Navarro MC, Rojas-Serrano J, Selman M. Morphologic diversity of chronic pigeon breeder’s disease: clinical features and survival. Respir Med 2011;105:608–614.
60. Trahan S, Hanak V, Ryu JH, Myers JL. Role of surgical lung biopsy in separating chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia from usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: analysis of 31 biopsies from 15 patients. Chest 2008;134:126–132.
61. Akashi T, Takemura T, Ando N, Eishi Y, Kitagawa M, Takizawa T, Koike M, Ohtani Y, Miyazaki Y, Inase N, et al. Histopathologic analysis of sixteen autopsy cases of chronic hypersensitivity pneu- monitis and comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/usual in- terstitial pneumonia. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:405–415.
62. Kuramochi J, Inase N, Miyazaki Y, Kawachi H, Takemura T, Yoshizawa Y. Lung cancer in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Respiration 2011;82:263–267.
63. Verma H, Nicholson AG, Kerr KM, Dempsey OJ, Gibbs AR, Campbell I, Black F, Rassl D, Rice AJ, Renzoni EA, et al. Alveolar proteinosis with hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a new clinical phenotype. Respir- ology 2010;15:1197–1202.
64. Rodrigo MJ, Postigo I, Wangensteen O, Guisantes JA, Martı ́nez J. A new application of Streptavidin ImmunoCAP for measuring IgG antibodies against non-available commercial antigens. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:1675–1678.
65. Reboux G, Piarroux R, Roussel S, Millon L, Bardonnet K, Dalphin JC. Assessment of four serological techniques in the immunological di- agnosis of farmers’ lung disease. J Med Microbiol 2007;56:1317–1321.
324 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE VOL 186 2012
66. Selvaraju SB, Kapoor R, Yadav JS. Peptide nucleic acid-fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) assay for specific detection of Mycobacterium immunogenum and DNA-FISH assay for analysis of pseudomonads in metalworking fluids and sputum. Mol Cell Probes 2008;22:273–280.
67. McSharry C, Dye GM, Ismail T, Anderson K, Spiers EM, Boyd G. Quantifying serum antibody in bird fanciers’ hypersensitivity pneu- monitis. BMC Pulm Med 2006;6:16.
68. Hisauchi-Kojima K, Sumi Y, Miyashita Y, Miyake S, Toyoda H, Kurup VP, Yoshizawa Y. Purification of the antigenic components of pigeon dropping extract, the responsible agent for cellular immunity in pi- geon breeder’s disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:1158–1165.
69. Ramı ́rez-Venegas A, Sansores RH, Pe ́rez-Padilla R, Carrillo G, Selman M. Utility of a provocation test for diagnosis of chronic pigeon breeder’s disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:862–869.
70. Ohtani Y, Kojima K, Sumi Y, Sawada M, Inase N, Miyake S, Yoshizawa Y. Inhalation provocation tests in chronic bird fancier’s lung. Chest 2000;118:1382–1389.
71. Bang KM, Weissman DN, Pinheiro GA, Antao VC, Wood JM, Syamlal G. Twenty-three years of hypersensitivity pneumonitis mortality surveillance in the United States. Am J Ind Med 2006;49:997–1004.
72. Hanley A, Hubbard RB, Navaratnam V. Mortality trends in asbestosis, extrinsic allergic alveolitis and sarcoidosis in England and Wales. Respir Med 2011;105:1373–1379.
73.
Pe ́ rez-Padilla R, Salas J, Chapela R, Sa ́ nchez M, Carrillo G, Pe ́ rez R, Sansores R, Gaxiola M, Selman M. Mortality in Mexican patients with chronic pigeon breeders lung compared to those with usual in- terstitial pneumonia. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:49–53.
74. Vourlekis JS, Schwarz MI, Cherniack RM, Curran-Everett D, Cool CD, Tuder RM, King TE Jr, Brown KK. The effect of pulmonary fibrosis on survival in patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am J Med 2004;116:662–668.
75. Hanak V, Golbin JM, Hartman TE, Ryu JH. High-resolution CT find- ings of parenchymal fibrosis correlate with prognosis in hypersensi- tivity pneumonitis. Chest 2008;134:133–138.
76. Koschel DS, Cardoso C, Wiedemann B, Ho ̈ffken G, Halank M. Pul- monary hypertension in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Lung 2012;190:295–302.
77. Ohtani Y, Saiki S, Sumi Y, Inase N, Miyake S, Costabel U, Yoshizawa Y. Clinical features of recurrent and insidious chronic bird fancier’s lung. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003;90:604–610.
