ALERT: DRUG AVAILABILITY CHANGES FOR TRANSPLANTS

I was reading the free local paper yesterday and was shocked to read an article by the AP regarding possible changes the protected medications list for Medicare recipients. I read further and was stunned. Is this just the beginning of changes that will directly affect our care, our lives? If it is just a cost saving issue, why are cancer and HIV/AIDS drugs still being protected? It states that it will save us money as, "That's because the drug plans can drive a harder bargain for manufacturer discounts when a drug is not protected." The word to note above is CAN not WILL. Also, it is not a single drug that we lung transplant patients need, it is a combination of drugs. I remember when a recent transplanted patient spoke to our ILD Support Group and he told us the monthly cost of his group of drugs after the transplant was $24,000 per month. Will we have to pay for our own needed drugs out of our pocket? Will only people who can afford the needed specific drugs have successful longterm transplants? 

Proposed Medicare drug change stirs access worries

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR Associated Press

POSTED:   01/10/2014 11:44:27 AM CST | UPDATED:   A DAY AGO

WASHINGTON—In a move that some fear could compromise care for Medicare recipients, the Obama administration is proposing to remove special protections that guarantee seniors access to a wide selection of three types of prescription drugs.

Advocates for patients are sharply criticizing the idea, but the Medicare prescription benefit's first administrator says greater availability of generic drugs nowadays may allow for some protections to be safely eased.

The three classes of drugs—widely used antidepressants, antipsychotics and drugs that suppress the immune system to prevent the rejection of a transplanted organ—have enjoyed special "protected" status since the launch of the Medicare prescription benefit in 2006.

That has meant that the private insurance plans that deliver prescription benefits to seniors and disabled beneficiaries must cover "all or substantially all" medications in the class, allowing broad access. The plans can charge more for costlier drugs, but they can't just close their lists of approved drugs, or formularies, to protected medications.

In a proposal published Friday in the Federal Register, the administration called for removing protected status from antidepressants, antipsychotics, and immunosuppressant drugs.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said that status is no longer needed to guarantee access, and the change would save millions of dollars for taxpayers and beneficiaries alike, while potentially helping with the problem of improperly prescribed antipsychotic drugs in nursing homes.

But advocates for patients are opposed, saying it could potentially limit access to critically needed medications for millions of people.

"We are disturbed by this," said Andrew Sperling, legislative advocacy director for the National Alliance on Mental Illness. "This is a key protection. It's a cornerstone of what has made the benefit work for people with mental illness."

Sperling said that patients with mental health issues often have to try a variety of drugs before they find the right one for their condition. He questioned whether the change would help crack down on the problem of improperly prescribed antipsychotics, saying it amounted to a blunt instrument.

The National Kidney Foundation also voiced worries. Legislative policy director Tonya Saffer said transplant patients often depend on combinations of medication, so having the broadest possible choice is crucial.

"Covering all immunosuppressant drugs is very important for the patient and very important to protect the transplanted organ from rejection," Saffer said.

The proposal could lead to "patients having to go through multiple channels to try and get a drug," which would put patients at risk, she added.

Medicare's prescription drug coverage has proven a popular benefit since it was added under President George W. Bush. The first administrator of the program, health policy expert Mark McClellan, says it may make sense to ease some patient protections because there are more low-cost generic alternatives now than was the case eight years ago. But he said the government has to be careful to find the right balance.

"The six classes were designated based on the science and the availability of drugs at the time," McClellan said. "Everyone should expect that the science and availability of drugs is going to change."

He added: "There is a clinical case to be made that not every drug in the class needs to be available on formulary."

In the proposal, the administration said the new policy was developed after careful consultation with experts. The three other types of drugs that have special status—for cancer, HIV/AIDS and preventing seizures—would remain protected. If adopted in the coming months, the new policy could take effect as early as 2015—with an additional year to make the change for antipsychotic medications.

The administration estimates the plan could save the taxpayers a total of $720 million by 2019. Beneficiaries may also be able to save. That's because the drug plans can drive a harder bargain for manufacturer discounts when a drug is not protected.

"We are concerned that requiring essentially open coverage of certain classes and categories of drugs presents both financial disadvantages and patient welfare concerns ... as a result of increased drug prices and overutilization," said the proposal from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services.

A leading industry analyst said the proposal would represent a significant change for Medicare's prescription benefit.

"It is a weakening of a patient protection," said Dan Mendelson, CEO of Avalare Health, a market analysis firm.

"I'm not sure that Medicare saves money from this kind of a change," he added. "Other elements of the program may have a cost increase if people are not using medications in the right way.